The dishonorable and unleashed judges appointed by Democrats are putting together our judicial system to revoke the results of the 2024 presidential elections. In case of throwing the ballots, these not chosen activist judges are abusing their power to bend and manipulate the jurisdiction of their courts to interpret the laws so that they obstruct the first agenda of America of the President Trump.
The judges of the lower courts are doing this every time, from trying to block President Trump’s effort to deport illegal migrants to avoid the dismissal of inexplicable bureaucrats. These judges often operate under their own agenda and expand their feuds for partisan political purposes.
An excellent example of this judicial overreach is the decision of Judge Amir Ali that the Trump administration must pay at least $ 2 billion to the NGOs that used US taxes of the State Department and USAID to finance liberal programs. Fortunately, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and the Trump administration have canceled most of these programs after determining that they do nothing to advance the national security of the United States, and in some cases they were even undermining it.
Representative Jim Jordan (R-OH), president of the Judicial Committee of the Chamber, speaks during an hearing at Congress on July 26, 2023 in Washington, DC. (Al Drago/Bloomberg through Getty Images)
A new administration must have freedom to carry out the wishes of the American people. Judge Ali’s ruling does not allow such discretion. This is not just an unstable legal argument. Judge Ali replaces his own policy interests on those of President Trump and Congress. In fact, he had no right to listen to the case in the first place, since the plaintiff’s NGOs were simply simply to raise the statement of payments from the contracts of the contracts, a case that should go to Hehard for the reason of the Verre uses.
To fix this judicial arrogance, President Mast is presenting a bill that would take away the power of judges such as Judge Ali to address monetary claims against the federal government on foreign assistance. This will allow the appropriate court to weigh each foreign aid contract objectively and determine whether or not to be paid.
Representative Brian Mast (R-FL) speaks while the United States Secretary of State, Antony Shine, testifies to the Chamber’s Foreign Affairs Committee on March 10, 2021 in Washington, DC. (Ting Shen-Pool/Getty Images)
The bill would also give the new presidential administrations 180 days to review and realine foreign aid funds with national security interests and priorities. If the Americans wanted to continue Joe Biden’s disastrous foreign policy, they would have chosen Kamala Harris last November. The Americans chose President Trump too much, and he has the mandate to lead.
Judge Ali’s decision subverts the will of the American people. An individual judge was able to impose a fine of $ 2 billion on US taxpayers, redefining US foreign policy priorities by deciding what it can and cannot be financed through foreign aid.
That judge is not the commander in chief. He is not the Secretary of State or the Secretary of Defense. He is not a member of the National Security counter, and he is certainly not a member of Congress with the power to authorize and finance foreign policy. Instead, he is a judge appointed by Biden.
Our checking system and balances was not designed to have a dishonest judge for direct foreign policy of the whole free world. The Constitution “reflects the Congress and the” firmly established “shared responsibilities of the Executive on Foreign Policy”, something that also judges Ali admits. However, his ruling is a limited constitutional order that swore to defend and defend.
Judge Ali’s ruling also ignores the mountains of waste, fraud and abuse that Congress has discovered in our foreign assistance system. Everything, from millions spent on sex change surgeries in Guatemala to condoms for the Taliban to transgender operas financing and even programs that help Indonesian coffee companies to be increasingly friendly with the weather. No one can explain how these programs benefited the United States or made us the election partner for another country. It would probably have a better leg if the government turned on its flames dollars that wasted in this way.
However, the judges of the lower courts think that the crooked system that allowed these programs to occur first should continue. Let’s work to ensure that it does not leave with yours and silence the voices of the more than 77 million Americans who voted for President Trump.
Jim Jordan represents the fourth district of the Ohio Congress in the House of Representatives of the United States and is the current president of the Judicial Committee of the Chamber and an original founder of the Freedom Caucus of the Chamber. Brian Mast represents the 21st district of the Florida Congress and is the president of the Chamber’s Foreign Affairs Committee.
